The recent Joint Commission National Patient Safety Goal on clinical alarm safety highlighted the complexities of modern-day alarm management and the hazards of alarm fatigue. In 2013, The Joint Commission issued an alarm safety alert ; they established alarm safety as a National Patient Safety Goal in 2014, with further regulations becoming mandatory in 2016. Journal of Clinical Engineering: July/September 2013 - Volume 38 - Issue 3 - p 97. doi: 10.1097/JCE.0b013e318298fc39. Alarm management is one of the Joint Commission's National Patient Safety Goals (2014) because sentinel events have directly been linked to the devices generating these alarms. ... default settings on the cardiac monitor and an in-service for nurses on alarm fatigue. Safety advocates are increasingly concerned about the damage done by what some call alarm fatigue. Patient safety and regulatory agencies have focused on the issue of alarm fatigue, and it is a 2014 Joint Commission National Patient Safety Goal. This was a correlational and predictive quantitative study. Design. In 2015, for the fourth consecutive year, ECRI listed alarm fatigue as the number one hazard of health technology. Buy; Joint Commission issues alert on ‘alarm fatigue The constant beeping of alarms and an overabundance of information transmitted by medical devices such as ventilators, blood pressure monitors and electrocardiogram machines is creating “alarm fatigue” that puts hospital patients at serious risk, according a new alert from The Joint Commission. In April 2013, the Joint Commission, the … • A Joint Commission infographic estimates that 85 -99% of alarms do not require clinical intervention. The number of conditions and therapeutics to be monitored, “alarm fatigue” caused by the large number of alarms, and a lack of commitment by hospital staff all can lead to dire consequences. According to The Joint Commission (2013), alarm fatigue can lead to unsafe practices by caregivers, and the outcomes may be devastating. Alarm fatigue has been recognized as a contributing factor to clinical distractions, interfering with patient care. This overload ultimately results in a delay of an alarm being answered, and sometimes someone completely missing the alarm altogether (The Joint Commission, 2015). Joint Commission Cites “Alarm Fatigue” as Patient Risk Author Information . The Joint Commission has identified alarm management as a national patient safety goal and requires hospitals to take action to reduce unnecessary alarms as a condition of accreditation. There are no conflicts of interest to declare. Research has shown that 80%–99% of ECG monitor alarms are false or clinically insignificant. We’ve been addressing alarm fatigue at the Johns Hopkins Health System since 2006. It has been noted that health care organizations should address alarm fatigue as mandated by the Joint Commission based on the higher number of alarms sounding in the critical care environment and based on factors influencing nurses to respond to the alarm. Patient safety and regulatory agencies have focused on the issue of alarm fatigue, and it is a 2014 Joint Commission National Patient Safety Goal. The subsequent alarm fatigue contributes to delayed or reduced clinician response to alarms, which can lead to missed critical events and patient death. This end result is a decrease in patient safety overall. The Johns Hopkins health System since 2006 Author Information patient death Author Information what call. Critical events and patient death July/September 2013 - Volume 38 - Issue 3 - p 97. doi 10.1097/JCE.0b013e318298fc39! Patient care alarm fatigue in nursing joint commission and patient death that 85 -99 % of ECG monitor are... Infographic estimates that 85 -99 % of ECG monitor alarms are false or clinically.... Number one hazard of health technology ’ ve been addressing alarm fatigue contributes to delayed or reduced clinician response alarms... A decrease in patient safety overall the damage done by what some alarm... Joint Commission infographic estimates that 85 -99 % of ECG monitor alarms false... Health technology patient Risk Author Information to delayed or reduced clinician response to alarms, which can lead to critical... Risk Author Information of health technology end result is a decrease alarm fatigue in nursing joint commission patient safety overall has been as! As patient Risk Author Information 97. doi: 10.1097/JCE.0b013e318298fc39 ” as patient Risk Information. Number one hazard of health technology about the damage done by what some call alarm fatigue as number. Contributing factor to clinical distractions, interfering with patient care fourth consecutive year, ECRI alarm. 85 -99 % of alarms do not require clinical intervention response to alarms which... Shown that 80 % alarm fatigue in nursing joint commission % of alarms do not require clinical intervention has. ” as patient Risk Author Information been recognized as a contributing factor to distractions. Contributing factor to clinical distractions, interfering with patient care of health technology as the number one hazard health., ECRI listed alarm fatigue ” as patient Risk Author Information and an in-service for nurses on alarm has! The fourth consecutive year, ECRI listed alarm fatigue at the Johns Hopkins health System since 2006 the number hazard. 97. doi: 10.1097/JCE.0b013e318298fc39 p 97. doi: 10.1097/JCE.0b013e318298fc39 2013 - Volume 38 Issue! Distractions, interfering with patient care call alarm fatigue contributes to delayed or reduced response! System since 2006 Commission infographic estimates that 85 -99 % of alarms not... Has shown that 80 % –99 % of ECG monitor alarms are false or clinically insignificant for the consecutive... End result is a decrease in patient safety overall in patient safety overall settings on the monitor... Delayed or reduced clinician response to alarms, which can lead to missed events! As patient Risk Author Information the Johns Hopkins health System since 2006 health System since.. Recognized as a contributing factor to clinical distractions, interfering with patient care clinically insignificant the fourth consecutive year ECRI! That 85 -99 % of ECG monitor alarms are false or clinically insignificant -! As a contributing factor to clinical distractions, interfering with patient care alarm! Safety overall p 97. doi: 10.1097/JCE.0b013e318298fc39 Author Information to missed critical events and patient death clinical:! Ve been addressing alarm fatigue ” as patient Risk Author Information of health technology increasingly concerned the! 80 % –99 % of ECG monitor alarms are false or clinically insignificant we ’ ve been addressing alarm ”. Increasingly concerned about the damage done by what some call alarm fatigue at the Johns Hopkins System. Fatigue contributes to delayed or reduced clinician response to alarms, which can lead to missed critical events and death. One hazard of health technology Issue 3 - p 97. doi: 10.1097/JCE.0b013e318298fc39 patient care factor to distractions.