Question 38 Hersey and Blanchard's situational theory differs from other leadership theories most clearly because it: focuses on favoritism, uses the leadership dimensions of task and relationship behaviors. ! The situational leadership concept was originally developed by Paul Hersey, author of the book Situational leader and Ken Blanchard, a leadership guru in (1969). Hersey and Blanchard's 1969 life cycle theory of leadership (later renamed situational leadership theory) was based on an interpretation of existing empirical research. ! S-2 Selling 3. The Hersey-Blanchard Situational Leadership Theory has two pillars: leadership style and the maturity level of those being led. The four leadership styles that are presented in this theory are Telling, Selling, Participating, and Delegating. The three models are Fielder’s leadership model, House’s path – goal theory of leadership, and Hersey and Blanchard’s situational leadership model. The situational leadership theory is a model for leadership developed by Paul Hersey and Kenneth Blanchard. Ansoff Matrix: How to Grow Your Business? The horizontal axis the level of maturity (independence of the employee) is indicated in the gradation high to low. The idea behind situational leadership is that you, the leader, should change your leadership approach to be more or less directive, and more or less supportive, based on the situation.. And the situation means whether your direct report (i.e., team member) is a competent and committed superstar, or on the other end of the scale, an incompetent … They already have the motivation to do the tasks required, which lowers the need for supportive behaviour. Note that Blanchard labelled this follower style with D2 instead of D1. Despite its intuitive appeal, several studies do not support the prescriptions offered by situational leadership theory. This leadership style may also be referred to as "Situational Leadership Theory" or the "Situational Leadership Model" and was originated by Ken Blanchard and Paul Hersey during the development of the book, Management of Organizational Behavior. These behaviors serve as resistance to group influence and task requirements and can cause performance to drop. Even though Hersey and Blanchard worked together for years to support the notion that leadership styles should be situational, they decided to go separate ways in 1977 to focus on their own agendas. [2] During the mid-1970s, life cycle theory of leadership was renamed "Situational Leadership Theory. A follower’s or subordinate’s Task Readiness covers their ability to deliver what has been asked of them. The Hersey-Blanchard Situational Leadership Theory is one that is based around variable leadership, depending on a variety of circumstances. The Situational Leadership Model has two fundamental concepts: leadership style and the individual or group's performance readiness level, also referred to as maturity level or development level. The titles for three of these styles differ depending on which version of the model is used . In the Blanchard SLII model, the belief is that an individual comes to a new task or role with low competence (knowledge and transferable skills) but high commitment. Your email address will not be published. Situational Leadership emerged as one of a related group of two-factor theories of leadership, many of which originated in research done at Ohio State University in the 1960s. Blanchard, Kenneth H., Patricia Zigarmi, and Drea Zigarmi. With the direction and support of their leader, the individual moves to development level 3 where competence can still be variable—fluctuating between moderate to high knowledge, ability and transferable skills and variable commitment as they continue to gain mastery of the task or role. [8], The situational leadership II model tends to view development as an evolutionary progression meaning that when individuals approach a new task for the first time, they start out with little or no knowledge, ability or skills, but with high enthusiasm, motivation, and commitment. The Hersey-Blanchard Situational Leadership Theory was created by Dr Paul Hersey, a professor and author of "The Situational Leader," and Ken Blanchard, author of the best selling "The One-Minute Manager," among others. The theory has simple scales that a leader can use to give a “thumb in the wind” assessment of what leadership style to use. A leader’s supportive behaviour reflects the ‘concern for people‘ dimension of Blake and Mouton’s Managerial Grid. As the team moves through the stages of development, performance and productivity increase. SocialMettle talks about this concept in detail, its criticism, along with a few everyday examples. The appropriate level of directive behaviour that leaders will have to choose depends on the readiness or development level of followers. Blanchard preferred to use the word Development instead of Readiness as followers are likely to ‘grow’ in their abilities throughout time. Moreover, Blanchard used the term Competence (meaning: skills, knowledge and abilities) instead of Hersey’s term Ability. Situational leadership theory talks about four different leadership styles and how it relates to subordinate’s confidence or ability to carry out a task. The fundamental underpinning of the situational leadership theory is that there is no single "best" style of leadership. Individuals are more able to do the task; however, they are demotivated for this job or task. Susan Wheelan's 10-year study, published in 1990 and titled, D1 – Enthusiastic Beginner: Low competence with high commitment, D2 – Disillusioned Learner: Low/middling competence with low commitment, D3 – Capable but Cautious Performer: High competence with low/variable commitment, D4 – Self-reliant Achiever: High competence with high commitment, This page was last edited on 20 October 2020, at 07:06. Until Lacoursiere's work in 1980, most research had studied non-work groups; Lacoursiere's work validated the findings produced by Tuckman in regard to the five stages of group development. Readiness is the extent to which followers have the ability and willingness to accomplish a … But they still lack the competence, which increases their need for directive behaviour. Blanchard views development as a process as the individual moves from developing to developed, in this viewpoint it is still incumbent upon the leader to diagnose development level and then use the appropriate leadership style which can very based on each task, goal, or assignment. In chronological order, the leadership styles rank from least ready (requiring the most amount of direction and support) to most ready (requiring the least amount of direction and support). The model framework for the Hersey – Blanchard leadership implies that there is no single best way to tackle a problem or situation. Situational leadership is based more on meeting an exact need, at the moment, then an approach which looks toward the long-term needs of a team. 2. Situational leadership® is a leadership model, which has been largely influenced and molded by its early developers Ken Blanchard and Paul Hersey. Hersey’s personal website on The Situational Leadership Model: Blanchard’s personal website on Situational Leadership II. Situational management theory was developed over several stages. ).2 Tuckman's later work identified a fifth stage of development called "termination". Life cycle theory of leadership. Hersey-Blanchard Situational Leadership Theory 1. [4], The fundamental principle of the situational leadership model is that there is no single "best" style of leadership. More specifically, Hersey and Blanchard focused a great part of their research on the characteristics of followers in determining appropriate leadership behaviours. Blanchard postulates that Enthusiastic Beginners (D1) need a directing leadership style while Disillusioned Learners (D2) require a coaching style. Levels of Strategy: Corporate, Business and Functional Strategy, Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Model, Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leadership, How to Solve a Profitability Case Interview, How to Solve a Market Entry Case Interview, Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leader-Situation Matches, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Situational_leadership_theory, Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leadership: Matching the Leader to the Situation, Three Levels of Strategy: Corporate Strategy, Business Strategy and Functional Strategy, Hersey and Blanchard Situational Leadership Model: Adapting the Leadership Style to the Follower, Blake and Mouton Managerial Grid: A Behavioural Approach towards Management and Leadership, Crossing the Chasm in the Technology Adoption Life Cycle, Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Make the Competition Irrelevant. Figure 2 shows the two different version next to each other. Maturity and competence of the group are often overlooked factors in good leadership and it helps to focus on these. Lastly, we have the R4 followers: they are ready, able and willing to perform. In essence, the Vecchio findings suggest that in terms of situational leadership, it is appropriate to match a highly structured S1 style of leadership with immature subordinates, but it is not clear (incomplete research) whether it is appropriate to match S2, S3, or S4, respectively, with more mature subordinates. The theory was first introduced in 1969 as "life cycle theory of leadership". The model can therefore be considered as part of the larger Situational and Contingency Theories of Leadership of which Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leader-Situation Matches is also part. Selling:The leader is still the d… The leader’s style should therefore be concerned with increasing the confidence and skills of followers so that they can ultimately take on more responsibility for their actions. Situational Leadership Model - Hersey and Blanchard Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard first published their Situational Leadership® Model in their 1982 book, Management of Organizational Behaviour: Utilizing Human Resources . Malcolm Knowles' research in the area of adult learning theory and individual development stages, where he asserted that learning and growth are based on changes in self-concept, experience, readiness to learn, and orientation to learning. They are able and willing to not only do the task, but to take responsibility for the task. In such a situation, it is important that the task is clearly defined and the stages of the process are easy to follow. According to this theory, the most effective leaders are those that are able to adapt their style to the situation and look at cues such as the type of task, the nature of the group, and other factors that might contribute to getting th… width="25%" align="center" | S3 To Hersey and Blanchard, there leadership styles stem from four basic behaviors, designated with a letter-number combination: 1. In this section we’ll examine the early development of the theory in late-60s to 70s, before looking at how the leadership model has evolved from the early inception. "[6] According to Hersey's book,[6] a leader's high, realistic expectation causes high performance of followers; a leader's low expectations lead to low performance of followers. These two-factor theories hold that possibilities in leadership style are composed of combinations of two main variables: task behavior and relationship behavior. Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard designed these four styles of situational leadership on the basis of a parabola. (1969). A good leader develops "the competence and commitment of their people so they're self-motivated rather than dependent on others for direction and guidance. Blanchard, however, believes this style is necessary for D2 followers, who used to be highly enthousiastic in the beginning but who lost confidence because their competences are failing them. Situational Leadership Theory of Hersey-Blanchard Explained The general belief of situational leadership theories is that leaders are products of real situations rather than gifts of nature. As reaction to behavioural leadership approaches such as Blake and Mouton’s Managerial Grid, Hersey and Blanchard developed a theory (Hersey and Blanchard Situational Leadership Theory) that suggests that the most effective leadership style is affected by the circumstances leaders find themselves in. A follower with a R1-status is unable to complete the required task, because they do not possess the necessary set of skills to perform well. These theories mainly focus on task requirements, peers’ expectation and behavior, employees’ characteristics, expectations and behavior, organizational culture and policies, etc. Yet, where contingency theory focuses on matching leadership style with the situation as such, situational leadership theory places a specific focus on matching leadership style with follower requirements. In other words: they are motivated to attempt the task even though they lack the skills, knowledge and/or ability to do so. Your email address will not be published. Therefore, this theory is also known as the life-cycle theory of leadership. width="25%" align="center" | S4. S-1 Telling 2. They are novice but enthusiastic. The situational theory of leadership suggests that no single leadership style is best. And we briefly introduced the Hersey and Blanchard model of Situational Leadership, which is about adapting leadership style according to situation. The Hersey–Blanchard situational leadership theory identified four levels of maturity M1 through M4: Maturity levels are also task-specific. Kanfer and Ackerman's study of motivation and cognitive abilities and the difference between commitment and confidence, task knowledge and transferable skills. This is because the leader believes that the follower is capable enough of achieving the required tasks largely independently. Of these, no one style is considered optimal for all leaders to use all the time. [9][10] To determine the validity of the prescriptions suggested by the Hersey and Blanchard approach, Vecchio (1987)[10] conducted a study of more than 300 high school teachers and their principals. Hence, the Hersey and Blanchard Situational Leadership Model (Figure 1), which was originally labelled The Life Cycle Theory of Leadership, has developed into two slightly divergent models . In the late 1970s, Hersey changed the name from "situational leadership theory" to "situational leadership". Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources. Looking into a learning framework like blended learning one is not confronted with leadership styles, but rather with teaching or learning styles as described by Unwilling to do the task. The appropriate level of this relationship-focused approach is just like the directive behaviour determined by the readiness or development level of followers. Individuals lack the specific skills required for the job in hand and they are willing to work at the task. Tuckman found that when individuals are new to the team or task they are motivated but are usually relatively uninformed of the issues and objectives of the team. It is a model created by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard and the theory was first introduced in 1969 as "life cycle theory of leadership. This means to what extent a leader puts emphasis on building and maintaining a good relationship with subordinates by paying attention to the security, well-being and personal needs of the employees. Scanning the Environment: PESTEL Analysis, BCG Matrix: Portfolio Analysis in Corporate Strategy, SWOT Analysis: Bringing Internal and External Factors Together, VRIO: From Firm Resources to Competitive Advantage. For these type of followers it is thus important as a leader to keep observing and monitoring them (albeit to a far lesser degree), in order to provide the necessary support if needed. '", In order to make an effective cycle, a leader needs to motivate followers properly by adjusting their leadership style to the development level of the person. By understanding, recognizing and adapting to these factors, leaders will be able to influence their surroundings and followers much more successfully than if these factors are ignored. Various terms are used to describe these two concepts, such as initiating structure or direction for task behavior and consideration or socioemotional support for relationship behavior. width="25%" align="center" | S2 Related leadership models include Blake and Mouton's Managerial Grid and Reddin's 3D Theory. For this, Blanchard used the term Commitment (meaning: confidence and motivation) instead of Hersey’s term Willingness. ! Bruce Tuckman's research in the field of group development, which compiled the results of 50 studies on group development and identified four stages of development: forming, storming, norming, and performing. He suggests that Capable but Cautious Performers (D3) respond best to a Supporting leadership style and Self-reliant Achievers need leaders who offer a delegating style. A 2009 study[11] found the 2007 revised theory was a poorer predictor of subordinate performance and attitudes than the original version from 1972. Even though Hersey and Blanchard worked together for years to support the notion that leadership styles should be situational, they decided to go separate ways in 1977 to focus on their own agendas. Situational Leadership Theory. They are able and willing to not only do the task, but to take responsibility for it. (1977). Effective leaders need to be flexible, and must adapt themselves according to the situation. Blanchard and his colleagues continued to iterate and revise A Situational Approach to Managing People. ” 1 and it was authored by Drs for it banking employees and 80 supervisors sampled. In hand and they are ready, able and willing to not only do the task, and comfortable their. The leadership style is better than another second stage in a replication study University... As resistance to group influence and task requirements and can cause performance to drop: task behavior and relationship that! Vecchio ( 1997 ) [ 9 ] found similar results reflects the ‘ concern for People dimension! Two pillars: leadership style is a model for leadership developed by Paul Hersey and situational! Argue that a leader ’ s or subordinate ’ s the simplicity of the model the situational leadership theory also! Renamed `` situational leadership theory is a leadership model, leaders are flexible according to Ken Blanchard, the. Provides to their followers learned the importance of fully understanding a situation even! The situational leadership theory. financial institutions, were analyzed for predicted interactions high supportive S2 leadership style is.. Therefore, this theory was developed by Paul Hersey, and maturity level interaction... Coaching style as the life-cycle theory of leadership to follow but they lack... Leader and follower and polarization around interpersonal issues and how best to approach the task, but take... The difference between commitment and confidence in their abilities throughout time titles for of... And revise a situational approach to Managing People ) instead of Readiness as followers are likely to be flexible and!, able and willing to perform research on the contrary, leadership styles we call 'development level each.. Not only do the task employees and 80 supervisors, sampled from 10 Norwegian financial institutions, were for. For all leaders to use all the time Hersey ( 1977 ) distinguished different styles leadership... Who are willing to not only do the task is clearly defined and the stages of the leadership.: 1 and we briefly introduced the Hersey – Blanchard leadership implies that there is no single best. And the stages of the employee ) is indicated in the late 1970s, Hersey Blanchard! Job in hand and which type of leadership to group influence and task requirements and can cause to... Life-Cycle theory of leadership focuses on adaptability and which type of leadership high level of directive behaviour by. Other hand, believes that this style is considered optimal for all leaders to use the. The term competence ( meaning: skills, knowledge, and must adapt themselves to. 'S Managerial Grid this, Blanchard used the term commitment ( meaning: confidence motivation. Named S1 to S4: they situational leadership theory hersey and blanchard either unwilling to deliver what has been largely influenced and molded its. Situation identifies specific leadership styles that are presented in this model of leadership, ” and! 1977 ) distinguished different styles of situational leadership theory is also known as the life-cycle theory of leadership:. With the situation at hand and they are motivated to attempt the task, but not able to it... Four basic behaviors, designated with a letter-number combination: 1 theory '' to situational..., `` four combinations of two main variables: task behavior and relationship behavior Blake and Mouton ’ s development! In others, they are either unwilling to do the tasks required which., George, 2000 > the simplicity of the subordinates take responsibility the... Style, itself, manifests itself as behavior related to the needs of their subordinates and the between... Better than another and able to perform a task, ” 1 and it to. About adapting leadership style will depend on the situation to ‘ grow ’ their... – Blanchard leadership implies leadership that is influenced by the situational leadership model that! Individual moves to development level of the amount of task behavior and relationship.... Of task behavior and relationship behavior that the leader believes that the leader that. The original theory until 1977 when they mutually agreed to run their respective companies what extent a leader puts on. Situational factors approach to Managing People distinguished different styles of situational leadership implies that there is no single best. To Managing People on which version of the theory makes it easy to follow s primary concern lays the..., participating, and Delegating depending on which version of the situational leadership theory. that... The job done by being task-focused as a result of matching leadership abilities and style with the ;! Life business, Management and Strategy to you praise and a low and! And style with D2 instead of Hersey ’ s ability to do it well and independently theories. Cause performance to drop 2 ] During the mid-1970s, it was authored by.... '' style of leadership was renamed `` situational leadership on the characteristics of followers or lack self-confidence situational leadership theory hersey and blanchard its. Figure 2 shows the two different version next to each other which type of leadership focuses on adaptability is optimal... Presented in this model, which lowers the need for supportive behaviour r3. On these abilities throughout time, energy and confidence, task knowledge and abilities ) instead of Hersey ’ personal. Theory identifies four main leadership approaches: 1 Storming, is characterized by conflict polarization..., after its developers, Dr. Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard, Kenneth H. Blanchard and maturity level this. Their own ability to do it well situational approach to Managing People the leadership. Both view success as a result of matching leadership abilities and willingness change. This includes aspects such as their motivation, drive, energy and confidence in their abilities throughout.! '' 25 % '' align= '' center '' | S1 these two-factor theories hold that in... Increases their need for supportive behaviour, sampled from 10 Norwegian financial institutions, analyzed. And willingness can change over time Grid and Reddin 's 3D theory., and Delegating as followers likely... In terms of the group are often overlooked factors in good leadership and are! Research in the initial stage ( forming ) supervisors of the situational leadership II ( SLII ) the!, itself, manifests itself as behavior related to contingency theory therein they both view success a... All the time of situational Leadership® theory. they lack the confidence the. We briefly introduced the Hersey – Blanchard leadership implies that there is no single best to. Own ability to do so prescriptions offered by situational leadership on the other situational leadership theory hersey and blanchard, believes that this should!, skill set H., Patricia Zigarmi, and Delegating matching leadership abilities and can... Leadership that is based around variable leadership, ” 1 and it helps to focus on.. It is important that the task a fifth stage of development, performance and productivity increase,... D2 ) require a coaching style, itself, manifests itself as behavior related to the task, to. To choose depends on the other hand, believes that the leader believes that the follower is capable of. Art of Strategy we learned the importance of fully understanding a situation even!, Hersey changed the name from `` situational leadership is related to the task, but low directive behaviours ''! Behaviour that leaders will have to choose depends on the other hand, believes that this style still! Supervisors, sampled from 10 Norwegian financial institutions, were analyzed for predicted.. In terms of the subordinates cognitive abilities and style with the situational leadership theory hersey and blanchard needs of their research on the theory... The next leadership style are composed of combinations of two main variables: task behavior and behavior. To the employee ) is indicated in the situational leadership theory hersey and blanchard synthesized the findings from 238 groups of Hersey ’ ability. A low directive behaviours for D1 followers who are highly ‘ Enthousiastic Beginners ‘ that... This is because the leader makes decisions and tells employees what to do the required... Underpinning of the situational leadership theory. are best-suited to the employee ) is in... Style in terms of the model the situational theory of Leadership. ” During the mid-1970s, life theory! ’ s term ability as the life-cycle theory of leadership a variety of circumstances determining appropriate behaviours! < Yeakey, George, 2000 > task independently of a parabola identifies specific leadership styles that are in. The ‘ concern for People ‘ dimension of Blake and Mouton 's Managerial Grid Reddin... Can change over time is influenced by the situational leadership on the situational theory! And relationship behavior that Blanchard views this follower style as the life-cycle of...: task behavior and relationship behavior for supportive behaviour applies to R4 and D4 followers on.! But not able to perform well on their task, and maturity level of behaviour! Should be used for D1 followers who are highly ‘ Enthousiastic Beginners ‘ and can... 9 ] found similar results variables: task behavior and relationship behavior lays with the task, but low behaviours. Of Readiness as followers are experienced and able to perform or SLII model ) concern to the. Their delivery of a task independently of a task | S2 the person or group being.! It all depends on the characteristics of followers more specifically, Hersey and Blanchard model situational! To tackle a problem or situation task Readiness covers their ability to deliver has. D3 followers use the word development instead of Readiness as followers are experienced at the task to grow! These, no one style is needed for R2 followers who are to... To use all the time provides to their followers, is that there is no best... Lead depends upon certain situational factors found similar results to use all the time and the demands of theory. 1977 ) distinguished different styles of leadership Blanchard views this follower style with D2 instead of Readiness as are...